What's new

Allied forces claim to kill 100 Taliban in Afghanistan

pkpatriotic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
2,317
Reaction score
0
Allied forces claim to kill 100 Taliban in Afghanistan

KABUL: Up to 100 Taliban were killed in Afghanistan early Sunday when helicopter gunships and ground fighting retaliated an attack by about 100 rebels.

The Taliban fighters had tried to capture the Spera district centre, 15 kilometres (nine miles) from the border with Pakistan, opening fire on police at about 2:00 am with guns and rocket-propelled grenades, the NATO force said.

Police and soldiers from NATO's International Security Assistance Force surrounded the attackers and called air strikes consisting of heavy machinegun fire from helicopters, an ISAF statement said.

"Some insurgents attempted to take cover in a nearby building that helicopters then struck with missiles.

"ANP (Afghan National Police) and ISAF continued to engage the insurgents in a firefight from the ground and air until the early morning hours," it said.

The number of insurgents killed was in the "double-digit figures," ISAF said.

The provincial governor of Khost, which includes Spera, put the attackers' death toll at between 50 and 70.

"They had killed one policeman in the initial attack and had captured another officer who was later beheaded," governor Arsala Jamal said.

"As they retreated, international military air forces came in and bombed them. Fifty to 70 Taliban have been killed," Jamal said.

The rebels were able to get "very close" to the district headquarters in Spera before the air forces arrived, the governor said.

The air strikes were later halted to avoid civilian casualties after the militants moved into villages, he said.

"We could have killed more Taliban if they had not entered the villages. Those of them killed were targeted while massing in an area outside the villages," he said.
 
Good news.

100 less of the terrorists. Good for the stability of Afghanistan and the region.
 
Good news.

100 less of the terrorists. Good for the stability of Afghanistan and the region.

NATO/ US have been killing innocent Afghan people in airstriks, how on earth the bomber aircrafts can diffrenciate between common Afghans and those fighting against them ??

anyway US/ NATO is creating more hatered for themselves \by killing innocent Afghans.
 
^^ My post is for Taliban only.

Any innocent killed of any nationality is a tragedy. As per the post, the Talibs were killed by Helicoptor gunships and ground fighting.

See also:

The air strikes were later halted to avoid civilian casualties after the militants moved into villages, he said

That shows a concern for civilian casualty on the part of the NATO forces but not by Taliban as the Taliban used villages to shelter knowing well that it could cause civilian deaths.
 
NATO/ US have been killing innocent Afghan people in airstriks, how on earth the bomber aircrafts can diffrenciate between common Afghans and those fighting against them ??

anyway US/ NATO is creating more hatered for themselves by killing innocent Afghans.

Well generally what happens is that they are requested for targeted strikes. So if fire is coming from a specific building then that building will be targeted. If the Taliban are shooting from someones house then it is their fault for putting the civilians in harms way.
 
^^ My post is for Taliban only.

Any innocent killed of any nationality is a tragedy. As per the post, the Talibs were killed by Helicoptor gunships and ground fighting.

That shows a concern for civilian casualty on the part of the NATO forces but not by Taliban as the Taliban used villages to shelter knowing well that it could cause civilian deaths.

Innocent casualties, some call it collateral damage, will claim its aftermath in decades to come as the orphans will rise to avenge their parents and lost loved ones. Honor and revenge are considered vistues, both are sacred to Afghans.

This is no victory...just another prove that US has no clue about the dynamics of the people that have formed this society.
 
Watch this movie andyou'll understand...



774e06b098504d8a7d2d5b57d2942a35._.jpg


 
Well generally what happens is that they are requested for targeted strikes. So if fire is coming from a specific building then that building will be targeted. If the Taliban are shooting from someones house then it is their fault for putting the civilians in harms way.

Key dont be so much one-sided the NATO/ US aircrafts have been targeting wedding parties too killing dozens of innocent civilians. Just check last month how many innocent civilians were killed by them and also it was not too much old news when just few days back NATO/US opened fire on Afghan police .
 
Neo, that is where it becomes important to rebuild Afghanistan so that it does not become a problem for the region and beyond again. And this requires support from all neighbors and all factions within the country.

Right now, to leave it would again invite instability and may be Taliban rule. Not a happy proposition for anyone, least of all for the Afghans and also for Pakistan.

If that happens, Pakistan will be next in line for them and the Pakistani Taliban would get a boost.

Problems for india will multiply too. It will again become a base for AQ. This time it may be a deadlier version of it.
 
Militancy and agression is not the correct way to 'liberate' Afghanistan for Taliban or to solve regional problems, its only making it worse.

Half the problems of Muslim countries would be solved if US changed her Pro-Israel Middle East policy, thats the root to most of the problems.
US' agression justifies Jihad, for every innocent muslim killed by US four more rise to avenge them...
How many will they kill..?
 
Militancy and agression is not the correct way to 'liberate' Afghanistan for Taliban or to solve regional problems, its only making it worse.

Half the problems of Muslim countries would be solved if US changed her Pro-Israel Middle East policy, thats the root to most of the problems.
US' agression justifies Jihad, for every innocent muslim killed by US four more rise to avenge them...
How many will they kill..?

Neo, you really think so? I find it hard to believe.

The ME issue is many decades old. The current wave of terror is a few decades old and came about when the USA (and Pakistan and Saudi) reared the monster during the Russian attack on Afghanistan.

Do you think that if the Palestinians got their state (which BTW is India's policy and I agree with that), all the terrorists will go home happily and become familymen overnight? The Talibans are in any way concerned with the Palestine issue?

What is happening is due to the perversion of the religion by people within. The external factors are mostly an alibi that are used for justification.

You would know more than me the books that some Egyptian "scholar" (don't remember the name) wrote that provides the ideological basis for the likes of AQ. It has nothing to do with what the others do or don't do.
 
Last edited:
I beg to differ! Terrorism is age old, but its become a cheap and very effective weapon since the first hi-jacking of a plane by Palestinians and the terrorist attack on Israeli Olympic squad in Munich. Satisfied with the results more and more jihadists joined terrorist organisations and became specialised in guerilla war fare.

US has continued to support Israel in each and every war, blunder after blunder was ignored (Sabra, Shatilla Lebanon) even if Israel violated international laws US never put her under embargo. She even rushed to fly munition and cluster bombs to Israel during first waves of attack where as most countries opt to embargo all parties in war.

9/11 is a direct result of US' unconditioned and blind support for Israel and her presence in ME.
Osama wanted US out of KSA (sacred land to many orthodox muslims) and out of Middle East, not out of this planet.
 
I beg to differ! Terrorism is age old, but its become a cheap and very effective weapon since the first hi-jacking of a plane by Palestinians and the terrorist attack on Israeli Olympic squad in Munich. Satisfied with the results more and more jihadists joined terrorist organisations and became specialised in guerilla war fare.

US has continued to support Israel in each and every war, blunder after blunder was ignored (Sabra, Shatilla Lebanon) even if Israel violated international laws US never put her under embargo. She even rushed to fly munition and cluster bombs to Israel during first waves of attack where as most countries opt to embargo all parties in war.

9/11 is a direct result of US' unconditioned and blind support for Israel and her presence in ME.
Osama wanted US out of KSA (sacred land to many orthodox muslims) and out of Middle East, not out of this planet.

OK, let's say the USA has helped Israel win the wars and to survive in the region.

So what? Why should this cause terror worldwide? In places far and wide which have nothing to do with Palestinians directly.

Why should it cause an Indian doctor to drive a burning Jeep in the Glasgow airport? Why should it cause some Pakistan origin Britons to cause 7/7? They were not even Arabs.

Was it also the cause of the various sectarian massacres by Taliban and by the AQ in Iraq?

Various injustices have happened in this world. Kashmiri Pundits have been rooted out from their homes. They don't go around bombing people, nor the Vietnamese, nor do the Chinese or the Koreans do that in Japan, the Japanese or the Germans are not burning down American cities after much bigger military losses and deaths on a far larger scale.

I know, you can talk about the concept of Muslim Ummah, but when people on this forum talk about Afghanistan, you can see that its only skin deep.

And last I read, the Americans were called for the protection of their country by the Saudi government themselves! They did not have enough trust in their own military or of any other Muslim government it seems.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom